When the highest court in the land says “No,” how does a president respond?
In a dramatic political showdown, Donald Trump launched an unusually personal attack against members of the Supreme Court of the United States after they struck down his administration’s sweeping global tariffs.
Here’s what happened — and why it matters.
The Big Decision: Court Blocks Trump’s Tariffs
In a major ruling, the Supreme Court held that:
- Presidents do not have inherent authority to impose sweeping global tariffs without congressional approval.
- The administration’s tariff program exceeded executive powers.
- The government may now have to refund billions in tariff revenue collected.
This marks one of the biggest judicial setbacks of Trump’s second term.
Trump’s Reaction: “Deeply Disappointing”
Just hours after the ruling, Trump held a press conference at the White House — and he did not hold back.
Key Highlights from His Remarks:
- Called the decision “deeply disappointing.”
- Said certain justices should be “absolutely ashamed.”
- Accused the court of lacking courage to “do the right thing.”
- Suggested the court may have been influenced by “foreign interests” (without evidence).
- Vowed to find alternative ways to continue imposing tariffs.
For nearly 45 minutes, Trump returned repeatedly to criticizing the justices, making it clear he felt personally betrayed.

The 6 Justices Who Ruled Against Him
The majority opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts.
The six justices who struck down the tariffs included:
- Elena Kagan
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
- Neil Gorsuch
- Amy Coney Barrett
- Chief Justice John Roberts
Notably, the majority included both Democratic and Republican appointees, including two justices Trump himself nominated.
Donald Trump’s Sharpest Criticism
Trump:
- Called some justices “fools and lapdogs.”
- Used the term “RINOs” (Republicans in Name Only).
- Said the votes were an “embarrassment” to certain justices’ families.
- Declined to say he regretted appointing Gorsuch and Barrett — but heavily criticized their decision.
Such direct attacks on sitting Supreme Court justices are rare in modern U.S. politics.
The 3 Justices Who Supported Him
Three justices dissented and supported keeping Trump’s tariff authority:
- Clarence Thomas
- Samuel Alito
- Brett Kavanaugh
Trump praised them for their “strength and wisdom and love of our country.”
In his dissent, Kavanaugh warned that refunding tariff revenue could create a financial “mess.”
Why This Case Matters
This ruling is bigger than just tariffs.
It touches on:
- The limits of presidential power
- Separation of powers between branches of government
- The rule of law vs executive authority
- Economic policy and global trade strategy
Trade experts called it a significant moment.
Colin Grabow of the Cato Institute described it as “a victory for the rule of law.”
Alan Wm Wolff, former deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization, noted the importance of the decision given how heavily Trump had invested in the outcome.
What Happens Next?
With the ruling in place:
- The administration may need to refund billions in tariff collections.
- Congress could potentially step in with new legislation.
- Trump has signaled he will look for alternative legal paths to impose trade measures.
- Global markets will closely watch how the administration responds.
Bigger Political Implications
This episode highlights:
- Increasing tension between the executive and judicial branches
- Trump’s willingness to publicly challenge institutional norms
- How trade policy remains central to his political identity
For supporters, it’s a fight for economic nationalism.
For critics, it’s a test of constitutional boundaries.
Final Take
When the Supreme Court draws a constitutional line, it shapes not just policy — but power itself.
This clash between President Trump and the nation’s highest court could define the balance of authority in his second term.
And the world is watching.